VALLE ALVAREZ v. BARR (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jose Ernesto VALLE-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 19-1586

Decided: March 11, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Gina M. Takemori, TAKEMORI LAW, Germantown, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Kathryn M. McKinney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Jose Ernesto Valle-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Valle-Alvarez’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)(1) (2019); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481, 483 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Valle-Alvarez (B.I.A. May 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law