EPPS v. FCI (2020)

Hugh Royal Epps appeals the district court’s memorandum opinions and orders dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2018), and denying Epps’ motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Epps v. United States, No. 3:17-cv-00646-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2019; Aug. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.