HARRIOT v. DOJ SESSIONS AUSA AUSA FBI FBI FBI FBI INS (2019)

Michael Owen Harriot appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harriot's motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm based on the district court's holding that Harriot's complaint is barred by the statute of limitations. Harriot v. DOJ, No. 3:18-cv-03164-JFA, 2019 WL 4316175 (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.