HARRIOT v. DOJ SESSIONS AUSA AUSA FBI FBI FBI FBI INS (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Michael Owen HARRIOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOJ, Jeff SESSIONS-Former U.S. Attorney General; Irene Josey, Former U.S. Attorney; Stacey D Haynes, AUSA; Scarlet A. Wilson, Former AUSA; Robert Waizenhoffer, FBI Special Agent; Rodney Pritchard, FBI Special Agent; Charles Klatz, FBI Special Agent; FBI; Unknown INS Agents, Department of Homeland Security; Unknown Sheriffs, Richland County Sheriff Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-7344

Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Owen Harriot appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harriot's motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm based on the district court's holding that Harriot's complaint is barred by the statute of limitations. Harriot v. DOJ, No. 3:18-cv-03164-JFA, 2019 WL 4316175 (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network