MCNEILL v. SMITH HARRIS (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

James C. MCNEILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Rene SMITH-HARRIS; Bianca Pirtle; Charlotte Williams; Erik Hooks; Eldridge Walker; Johnny Hawkins; Thomas McCurdy; Kenneth Little; Billy O. Cooper; Sgt. David Gillis; Sgt. J. Curtis Jones; Chicquita A. Lucas; Sgt. Wilson, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-7224

Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

James C. McNeill appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Smith-Harris, No. 5:19-ct-03010-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. The district court dismissed the complaint in part for failure to state a claim and in part without prejudice as to McNeill's ability to assert in a habeas corpus petition his claims of due process violations in connection with disciplinary proceedings.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law