UNITED STATES v. ROBINSON (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Franklin Mackensie ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 19-7132

Decided: November 26, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Franklin Mackensie Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Franklin Mackensie Robinson appeals the district court's text order denying his motion for judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to Robinson's criminal proceedings, and the district court did not err in denying this frivolous motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network