Sean McKirdy, Defendant - Appellee, v. CHERDAK (2019)
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
FITISTICS, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff - Appellee, Sean McKirdy, Defendant - Appellee, v. Erik B. CHERDAK, Defendant - Appellant.
Fitistics, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff - Appellee, Sean McKirdy, Defendant - Appellee, v. Erik B. Cherdak, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 18-2053, No. 19-1732
Decided: November 20, 2019
Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Erik B. Cherdak, Appellant Pro Se. John Daniel Victor Ferman, BANKS & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Erik B. Cherdak appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a bench trial as well as several orders disposing of the parties’ postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitistics, LLC, v. Cherdak, Nos. 1:16-cv-00112-LO-JFA; 1:17-cv-00500-LO-IDD, 2018 WL 4059375 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2018). We deny the motion to supplement the record on appeal. We deny Fitistics’ and McKirdy’s motion for sanctions, but caution Cherdak that continued pursuit of vexatious litigation tactics and the filing of frivolous appeals may result in sanctions in future cases. We deny Cherdak’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.