DINKINS v. USP (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

James DINKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. John PYLES, Provider FNP-BC/Contractor USP Hazelton, individually and official capacity; Gregory Mims, MD and CD/contractor USP Hazelton, individually and official capacity; Anne McArdle, Assistant Health Administrator/Contractor USP Hazelton, individually and official capacity; Joe Coakley, Warden, individually and official capacity; United States of America, Defendants - Appellees, Federal Bureau of Prisons; Hunt, Lab Technician/Contractor USP Hazelton, Individually, Defendants.

No. 19-6635

Decided: November 07, 2019

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

James Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se.

James Dinkins appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dinkins's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dinkins v. Pyles, No. 2:18-cv-00003-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. filed Apr. 12, 2019; entered Apr. 16, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network