GARRETT v. II PREA CI 2015 2015 27 2016 27 2016 (2019)
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Robert Louis GARRETT, Jr., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Franklin RICHARDSON; Rogers; McBride, Defendants - Appellees, Donald Lane; Randall Fowler, Jr.; James Parrish; Lefford Fate; Samuel Soltis; Dr. Koon; Dr. Arrojas; Dr. T. Ergen; Doctor Kocher; Dr. Sridaran; Cecelia Reynolds; Larry Cartledge; Leroy Cartledge; James Parker; Dr. B. Lewis; Dr. A. Compton; Dr. Bryne; Sharon Patterson; Kennard Dubose; Ann Hallman; C. Hindenburg, II; K. Rivers; P. Talbert; Barns; Curtis Earley; Florence Mauney; Amy Enloe; PREA Compliance Manager at Perry CI (2015); Lasley; Williams; Degeorgis; Wantonta Golden; Lindsey Harris; Jeff Bilyeu; Meagan Harris; Katherine Burgess; R. Blackburn; Chad Binkley; Kenneth Myers; James Jennings; Nathan Rice; Aull; Beckett, Jr.; T. Esterline; B. Roberts; Stephon; Gina Williamson; Washington; Olds; Stephanie McMillan; Pamela C. Derrick; Myecha Miley; Brown; Sharp; Michelle Fox; Beverly A. Wood; V. Grubbs; Larry Morris; M. Newton; John Pate; Michael McCall; Cassandra Means; Ashley Maddox; Wilkens-Smith; McCoulough; Willie Davis; Katora Gause; Bernadette Jefferson; Unknown Officers, from 9 May 2015 Attack; Unknown Person, who made the call to give me no pain medication the day I got out of the hospital (27 May 2016); Unknown Persons, who made the call not to send me to the infirmary the day I got out of the hospital 27 May 2016; Mr. Barkley; Director Bryan P. Stirling, The Current Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; Bernard McKie, Defendants.
Decided: October 22, 2019
Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order dismissing Garrett's motions to compel and for sanctions and the magistrate judge's order denying without prejudice Garrett's motion to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Garrett seeks to appeal are neither final nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.