MEYERS v. CLARKE (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

David MEYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director; F.B.I.; D.O.J.; U.S. District Court; Conrad, U.S. Judge; R. Ballou; C. Dudley; Dr. Laurence Wang; R. Stoots; B. Alvis; B. Dye; R. Bishop; S. Simons; J. D. Bentley; J. Fannin; C. R. Stanely; Walter Swiney; Ofc. Gwen; D. Tate; F. Stanely; A. Clevinger; D. C. Stallard; Paul Haymes; A. Robinson; M. L. Counts; Western Regional Prea Analyst; J. King, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-6178

Decided: October 21, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.

David Meyers, a Virginia inmate and three-striker, appeals the district court's order denying his postjudgment motion to seal. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599, 98 S.Ct. 1306, 55 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978) (stating standard of review); In re Application & Affidavit for a Search Warrant, 923 F.2d 324, 326 (4th Cir. 1991) (same). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Meyers’ motions to consolidate and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law