Alba Nadina IGLESIAS-ORELLANA; L.F.Z.I.; X.N.Z.I., Petitioners, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
Decided: September 25, 2019
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Devon R. Senges, DUMMIT FRADIN, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Jessica A. Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Allison Frayer, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Alba Nadina Iglesias-Orellana and her minor children, all natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Iglesias-Orellana’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have considered Iglesias-Orellana’s claims after thoroughly reviewing the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Iglesias-Orellana (B.I.A. Feb. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.