HENOUD v. SMITH (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

John Maurice HENOUD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Donna SMITH, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 19-6699

Decided: September 24, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

John Maurice Henoud, Appellant Pro Se.

John Maurice Henoud, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henoud v. Smith, No. 5:18-hc-02226-D (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law