UNITED STATES v. FRYE (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Keesha Elayne FRYE, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 19-6155

Decided: September 10, 2019

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Keesha Elayne Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Schaffer Knapp, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Keesha Elayne Frye appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice her motion challenging the amount of her monthly restitution payment.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 1:17-cr-00115-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2019). We deny Frye's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. The dismissal order is final and appealable because the district court's grounds for dismissal indicate that no amendment to the motion could cure any of the defects identified in Frye's motion. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law