WILLIAMS v. MOYER 10 (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Scotland E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Stephen MOYER, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; Dayena Corcoran, Commissioner of Correction; Frank Bishop, Warden; Mailroom Staff, Doe 1-10; Mailroom Supervisor; M. Rose; Robert Kruise, Jr., Correctional Officer 2; R. Hammons, Librarian, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-6421

Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment in Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Moyer, No. 1:18-cv-00363-ELH, 2019 WL 1077431 (D. Md. filed Mar. 6, 2019 & entered Mar. 7, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law