IN RE: Steven Desmond PETERSON (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Steven Desmond PETERSON, a/k/a Primo, Petitioner.

No. 19-1117

Decided: August 29, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Steven Desmond Peterson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Steven Desmond Peterson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the district court in ruling on a number of pending motions and seeking an order directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that the district court ruled upon all pending motions by order entered on August 15, 2019. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law