NELLIGAR v. Deputy Beler, Grievance Coordinator, Deputy acting under the Color of State Law; Deputy Garcia, Grievance Coordinator, Deputy acting under the Color of State Law, Defendants. (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Anthony Wade NELLIGAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Corporal EATON, SheriffsDeputy; Clerk of United States District Court; United States District Court; American Civil Liberties Union; Attorney General; Gerald Wilson Nelligar, Attorney at Law (Father); Bobby Scott, Senator; Corporal Crosby, Corporal/Deputy Actiong under Color of State Law; Doctor Jamaludeen, Medical Doctor acting under Color of State Law; Mr. Floyd, RN, HSA Naphcare - Acting under the Color of the Law; Corporal Wynne, Corporal Deputy acting under Color of State Law; Deputy Brannon, Sheriffs Deputy acting under Color of State Law; Lieutenant Norris, Sheriff, Acting under the Color of the Law; M. Foran, RN, Acting under Color of State Law; Corporal B. Spears, Sheriffs Deputy; Deputy Brown, Sheriffs Deputy, Defendants - Appellees, Deputy Beler, Grievance Coordinator, Deputy acting under the Color of State Law; Deputy Garcia, Grievance Coordinator, Deputy acting under the Color of State Law, Defendants.

No. 19-6469

Decided: August 23, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Anthony Wade Nelligar, Appellant Pro Se. Grace Morse-McNelis, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Anthony Wade Nelligar appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order and failure to provide the court with an updated mailing address. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nelligar v. Eaton, No. 1:18-cv-00508-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law