MUHAMMAD v. Rod Wicker; R. Clary; R. Mathena; T. Lowe; J. Kiser; Captain Lee; M. Kegley; G. K. Washington; Erma Locust, Defendants. (2019)
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Malcolm MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Y. TAYLOR; C. S. Arms; J. Sykes; J. D. Hurt; Henry Ponton, Defendants - Appellees, Rod Wicker; R. Clary; R. Mathena; T. Lowe; J. Kiser; Captain Lee; M. Kegley; G. K. Washington; Erma Locust, Defendants.
Decided: August 15, 2019
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the magistrate judge’s final order and judgment after a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the order and judgment. See Muhammad v. Taylor, No. 7:16-cv-00500-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
FOOTNOTE. The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.