MUHAMMAD v. Rod Wicker; R. Clary; R. Mathena; T. Lowe; J. Kiser; Captain Lee; M. Kegley; G. K. Washington; Erma Locust, Defendants. (2019)

Malcolm Muhammad appeals the magistrate judge’s final order and judgment after a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the order and judgment. See Muhammad v. Taylor, No. 7:16-cv-00500-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.