HAYNESWORTH v. CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS NFN NFN NFN (2019)

Alphonso Haynesworth appeals from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, granting summary judgment to Defendants on his constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his South Carolina state law claims, and dismissing those claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Sols., No. 2:17-cv-03247-CMC, 2018 WL 6695715 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.