Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Glenn MYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Ralph NORTHAM, Governor; Michael I. Elliott; Sheila K.W. Elliott; Rafael Saenz; Cynthia Warriner; Jody H. Allen; Melvin L. Boone, Sr.; James L. Jenkins, Jr.; Rebecca Thornbury; Allen R. Jones, Jr.; Sarah Schmidt; Susan Szasz Palmer; Elizabeth Locke; Arena L. Dailey; Tracey Alder; Mira Mariano; Jay Douglas; Huong Vu; Brenda Krohn; Jodi Power; Robin Hills; Paula Saxby; Stephanie Willinger; Linda Kleiner; Charlotte Ridout; Fairfax County; Inova Pharmacy; Jane Doe, Pharmacy Director; Several Pharmacists at Inova; Walgreen Pharmacies; Bodies in Motion; Michael Mastrostefano, Bodies in Motion; Aetna Insurance; Jane and Joe Does Nurses; Haas Doe Medical Records at ADC, Defendants - Appellees, Sharon Bulova; Prosperity Pharmacy; Pharmacist of Prosperity Pharmacy; John Does Pharmacist and Technicians at Prosperity Pharmacy; Fairfax Adult Detention Center Employees; Stacie Kincaid; Omar “The Butcher” Mercedes, Defendants.
Glenn Myer seeks to appeal the district court's order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his civil action for failure to state a claim for relief and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not rule on Myer's claims against Officer C.M. Cotone, who was added as a defendant in Myer's amended complaint filed on October 15, 2018, following the district court's grant of Myer's motion to amend. Thus, the district court's order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696-97 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the action for the district court to consider these claims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1035
Decided: August 05, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)