SATTERFIELD v. City of Chesapeake Police Department, Defendant. (2019)

Wade B. Satterfield appeals the magistrate judge’s ^* order granting summary judgment to Defendants on Satterfield’s racially motivated retaliation claims, which Satterfield filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Satterfield v. Horne, No. 2:16-cv00665-LRL (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2018). On appeal, Satterfield presents arguments and evidence that he did not raise at trial, which are accordingly waived. See Bresler v. Wilmington Tr. Co., 855 F.3d 178, 201 n.23 (4th Cir. 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.