RAMIREZ v. RABON MD UCAC BOP APRN FNP RN HSA (2019)

Ubaldo Arriaga Ramirez appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying Ramirez's motion for the appointment of counsel, and denying relief on his complaint alleging a Bivens ^* claim, a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012) claim, and a state medical malpractice claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramirez v. Rabon, No. 0:18-cv-01846-DCC, 2019 WL 1785292 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2019).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.