MCCLARY v. BUTLER CI (2019)

Ronald McClary appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing without prejudice McClary's civil rights complaint because McClary failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2012); Ross v. Blake, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1854-55, 195 L.Ed.2d 117 (2016) (noting that inmate must exhaust available remedies “before bringing suit to challenge prison conditions”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Butler, No. 5:18-cv-00098-FDW, 2019 WL 415336 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.