ROBINSON v. MARTIN (2019)

Tommy Ray Robinson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Martin, No. 8:17-cv-00535-DKC, 2018 WL 656444 (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2018). In addition, we note that numerous claims are raised by Robinson for the first time on appeal. We decline to consider these claims. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that claims raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered, absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice); First Virginia Banks, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Oil Inc., 206 F.3d 404, 407 n.1 (4th Cir. 2000) (declining to consider issues raised for first time on appeal). We deny Robinson's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.