IN RE: Kareem Jamal CURRENCE (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Kareem Jamal CURRENCE, Petitioner.

No. 19-1399

Decided: June 17, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.

Kareem Jamal Currence has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on several motions Currence filed in his criminal matter, and he seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act on the motions. The present record reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law