CORNELIUS ANDERSON v. GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Rufus Julius CORNELIUS ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-1322

Decided: June 17, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rufus J.C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas James Asper, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Greenville Health System's motion to dismiss his retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018); and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 to 12213 (West 2013 & Supp. 2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Anderson v. Greenville Health Sys., No. 6:17-cv-03239-DCC, 2019 WL 1055253 (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network