JONES v. WELLS FARGO BANK 2006 026 100 (2019)

Victor O. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman ^* doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 6:17-cv-02486-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 4, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.