MCCOLLUM v. PETERKIN (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Waddell MCCOLLUM; Lena McCollum, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Hubert PETERKIN; Timothy Rugg; Samuel Morant; Timothy Kavanaugh; Stanley Davis; Hoke County; John Doe #1; John Doe #2; John Doe #3; John Doe #4; John Doe #5, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-1982

Decided: May 01, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Waddell McCollum, Lena McCollum, Appellants Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Waddell and Lena McCollum appeal the district court's order denying relief on their complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and related state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCollum v. Peterkin, No. 1:17-cv-00965-WO-JLW, 2018 WL 3242297 (M.D.N.C. July 3 & July 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network