Hugh PLUNKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.D. HAYES, Institutional Investigator/Correctional Lt. Sussex II State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
Decided: April 10, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Hugh Plunkett, Appellant Pro Se.
Hugh Plunkett appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as barred by the statute of limitations and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Plunkett v. Hayes, No. 1:17-cv-01184-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3, 2018 & entered Apr. 4, 2018; May 21, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.