PLUNKETT v. HAYES II (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Hugh PLUNKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.D. HAYES, Institutional Investigator/Correctional Lt. Sussex II State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-7403

Decided: April 10, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Hugh Plunkett, Appellant Pro Se.

Hugh Plunkett appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as barred by the statute of limitations and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Plunkett v. Hayes, No. 1:17-cv-01184-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3, 2018 & entered Apr. 4, 2018; May 21, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network