HAENDEL v. REED BB (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Dan HAENDEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anna REED, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney City of Staunton; BB Cully, Police Officer, City of Staunton; Raymond C. Robertson, Commonwealth Attorney, City of Staunton; Jim Williams, Chief of Police, City of Staunton; Mark R. Herring, Attorney General Commonwealth of Virginia; Howard W. Clarke, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-7216

Decided: March 26, 2019

Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dan Haendel, Appellant Pro Se.

Dan Haendel appeals the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haendel v. Reed, No. 7:17-cv-00119-JLK-RSB, 2018 WL 847179 (W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2018; Sept. 10, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law