METCALF v. GRAHAM COUNTY (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Ron METCALF; Claudia Metcalf, Legal Guardians for other D.J.M., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GRAHAM COUNTY, harbor for D.S.S., in their Individual and Official Capacities; Swain County, harbor for D.S.S., in their Individual and Official Capacities; Kim Carpenter, Attorney, in her Individual and Official Capacities; Susan Call, in her Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-2456

Decided: March 26, 2019

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Ron David Metcalf, Claudia Metcalf, Appellants Pro Se.

Ron David Metcalf and Claudia Metcalf appeal the district court's orders dismissing their complaint without prejudice and denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. Graham Cnty., No. 1:18-cv-00274-MR-DLH, 2018 WL 4924556, 2018 WL 6028715 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 10 & Nov. 15, 2018). We deny the Metcalfs’ motions for various types of relief, including their motions to appoint counsel and for a stay of proceedings, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law