CLARKE v. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES (2019)

Nigel Clarke appeals the district court's order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.^* Clarke v. Fourth Circuit Court Judges, No. 5:17-ct-03025-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   Although Clarke has named the judges of this court as defendants, we exercise our discretion to decide the appeal pursuant to the rule of necessity. See United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-17, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.