BRAXTON v. TUMINELLI (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Savino BRAXTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arcangelo M. TUMINELLI, Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.
Savino Braxton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John F. Purcell, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-6865, No. 18-6866

Decided: January 24, 2019

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

In No. 18-6865, Savino Braxton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. In No. 18-6866, he appeals the district court's orders denying relief on a separate § 1983 complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Tuminneli, No. 1:18-cv-00508-JKB (D. Md. June 22, 2018); Savino v. Purcell, No. 1:15-cv-02828-GLR, 2017 WL 5716755 (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2017 & June 26, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law