HEROLD v. LYNCH (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick W. HEROLD, Jr., Individually, and Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendants of the Estate of Frederick William Herold, Julie A. Morrone, Allison P. Dickie, Kristin M. Larimore, and Jonathan D. Herold, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Merrill LYNCH, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.; Bradford E. Bugher; the Estate of Fredrick William Herold, Nominal Defendant; Julie A. Morrone, Nominal Defendant; Allison P. Dickie, Nominal Defendant; Kristin M. Larimore, Nominal Defendant; Jonathan D. Herold, Nominal Defendant, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-2050

Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Herold v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-00449-JAG (E.D. Va. July 23 & Aug. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law