RAYNOR v. CLARKE MS (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Rabbi James H. RAYNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE; MS. Patillo, Accounting Office; T. Preston, Accounting Office, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-6919

Decided: January 17, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

James Herman Raynor, Appellant Pro Se.

James H. Raynor appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Raynor v. Clarke, No. 1:17-cv-01308-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. July 11, 2018). We deny Raynor's motions to compel documents, to compel discovery, to enforce settlement agreement, to waive fees under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and to file a formal want of debt. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law