STOYANOV v. MABUS 70 74 743 EEO 00 39 (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Yuri J. STOYANOV, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MABUS; James H. King, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; Kevin M. Wilson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74; David L. Mayo, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Head of Code 743; Mark Thomas, Individually and in His Official Capacity as EEO Chief and Commander of Code 00; David Caron, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-1934

Decided: December 20, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.

Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss his civil claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stoyanov v. Mabus, No. 1:08-cv-01834-GLR (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law