BANDARA v. MANN AAE (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Dr. D.M. Indika BANDARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dan MANN, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, AAE Director; James A. Compton, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members (Chairman); Carol Fowler, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; F. Xavier Starkes, Esq, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; William Dukes, a/k/a Bill, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Jerrod F. Howard, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Richard McIntyre, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Dan P. Bell, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Hazel L. Bennett, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; D. J. Carson, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; David N. Jordan, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; James L. Whitmire, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Duane Cooper, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Lynne Douglas, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-1903

Decided: December 20, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

D.M. Indika Bandara, Appellant Pro Se. Carey Michael Ayer, DAVIS FRAWLEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.M. Indika Bandara appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her complaint raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-7 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bandara v. Mann, No. 3:16-cv-03212-TLW, 2018 WL 2763395 (D.S.C. filed June 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law