UNITED STATES v. GRAY (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clyde Austin GRAY, Jr., a/k/a Poochie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-6894

Decided: December 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Clyde Austin Gray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Clyde Austin Gray, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gray, No. 1:09-cr-00326-TSE-2 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2018). We deny Gray's motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network