LEISER PLLC v. LEMON (2018)

Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.^* See Leiser v. Lemon, No. 1:18-cv-00349-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. June 21, 2018); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006); Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 463-64, 126 S.Ct. 1198, 163 L.Ed.2d 1059 (2006); Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 899 F.3d 260, 283 (4th Cir. 2018); Thana v. Bd. of License Comm'rs for Charles Cty., 827 F.3d 314, 318-20 (4th Cir. 2016); Adkins v. Rumsfeld, 464 F.3d 456, 464-65 (4th Cir. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   We agree that the district court lacked jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, or alternatively, based on Appellants’ failure to demonstrate standing.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.