Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Glenn MYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Uriah KENNEDY; Gentox Medical Services; Chris Seymour, individual and official capacities, Regional Manager; Matt Riddle, individual and official capacities, Director of Distributors; I. L. Palencia, O.F.C., individual and official capacities; Tajweer Beaufort, PFC, individual and official capacities; Mike Porter, Sgt, individual and official capacities; Fairfax County; Fairfax County Government, Sharon Bulova Governing Fairfax; Celling Biosciences, Defendants-Appellees.
Glenn Myer seeks to appeal the district court's order granting Matt Riddle's and Celling Biosciences’ motions to dismiss claims in Myer's amended civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because claims against several defendants remain pending below and the district court did not certify the order for immediate appeal, the order Myer seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-1792
Decided: December 03, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)