ACKBAR v. MCCALL (2018)

Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). Upon review and having liberally construed Ackbar's informal brief, we find that he fails to challenge the bases for the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his complaint, including its finding that such dismissal constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We therefore conclude that he has waived appellate review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“[O]ur review is limited to issues preserved in [the informal] brief.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. McCall, No. 4:18-cv-01581-RMG, 2018 WL 3238826 (D.S.C. July 3, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.