UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard GIBSON, Sr., a/k/a Bernard Willis, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: November 20, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion asking the district court to remove from the amended criminal judgment against him any reference to supervised release. Rule 36 only allows for the correction of clerical errors and not the type of substantive relief Gibson seeks. See United States v. Powell, 266 F. App'x 263, 266 (4th Cir. 2008) (argued but unpublished). We thus affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-01388-454-PJM-2 (D. Md. filed July 27, 2018 & entered Aug. 1, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.