UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Frederick SATTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: November 15, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Jerome Frederick Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Jerome Frederick Satterfield appeals from the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), but denying his request to have his federal sentence run concurrently to his state sentence. We have reviewed the court's order de novo and find no error. United States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 2267, 198 L.Ed.2d 704 (2017) (stating standard of review). We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.