UNITED STATES v. SATTERFIELD (2018)

Jerome Frederick Satterfield appeals from the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), but denying his request to have his federal sentence run concurrently to his state sentence. We have reviewed the court's order de novo and find no error. United States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 2267, 198 L.Ed.2d 704 (2017) (stating standard of review). We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.