UNITED STATES v. PHILLIPS AJ (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arous John PHILLIPS, a/k/a AJ, a/k/a Villan, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-6344

Decided: October 15, 2018

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Arous John Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.

Arous John Phillips appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2012). The district court held that § 3742 provides only for the filing of notice of direct appeal and concluded that any appeal would be untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Phillips, No. 2:10-cr-00048-AWA-TEM-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2018). We deny Phillips’ motion for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law