Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SIERRA CLUB, INC.; Appalachian Voices; Wild Virginia, Inc. Petitioners v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; United States Department of Agriculture Respondents Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Intervenor
Cherokee Forest Voices; The Clinch Coalition; Georgia ForestWatch; MountainTrue Amici Supporting Petitioner The Wilderness Society; Preserve Craig, Inc.; Save Monroe, Inc. Petitioners v. United States Forest Service; United States Department of Agriculture Respondents
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Intervenor Sierra Club, Inc.; Appalachian Voices; Wild Virginia, Inc. Petitioners v. United States Department of the Interior; United States Bureau of Land Management; United States Forest Service; United States Department of Agriculture Respondents Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Intervenor
Cherokee Forest Voices; The Clinch Coalition; Georgia ForestWatch; MountainTrue Amici Supporting Petitioner The Wilderness Society; Preserve Craig, Inc.; Save Monroe, Inc. Petitioners v. United States Department of the Interior; United States Bureau of Land Management; United States Forest Service; United States Department of Agriculture Respondents Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Intervenor
ORDER
Intervenor Mountain Valley Pipeline (“MVP”) has filed a petition for rehearing in this case. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. Proc. 40(a)(4)(A) and (C), we grant rehearing for the limited purpose of clarifying that our prior opinion in Sierra Club v. United States Forest Service, 897 F.3d 582 (4th Cir. 2018), does not vacate the portion of the Bureau of Land Management's Record of Decision authorizing a right of way and temporary use permits for MVP to cross the Weston and Gauley Bridge Turnpike Trail. The opinion otherwise remains in effect, and reargument is not necessary.
Entered at the direction of Judge Thacker with the concurrence of Chief Judge Gregory and Senior Judge Traxler.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2399 (L), No. 18-1012, No. 18-1019, No. 18-1036
Decided: October 10, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)