Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

IN RE: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED, Debtor. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC, Creditor-Appellant, v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US LLC, (Turnaround Advisor for Alpha Natural Resources), Defendant-Appellee, Alpha Natural Resources, Incorporated, Defendant.

IN RE: Alpha Natural Resources, Incorporated, Debtor. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC, Creditor-Appellant, v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services US LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2268, No. 17-2269

Decided: September 06, 2018

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Susan M. Freeman, Daniel A. Arellano, LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Steven Rhodes, STEVEN RHODES CONSULTING, LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan; David R. Ruby, William D. Prince IV, Michael G. Matheson, THOMPSONMCMULLAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Sheldon S. Toll, LAW OFFICES OF SHELDON S. TOLL PLLC, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant. Bruce H. Matson, Christopher L. Perkins, LECLAIRRYAN, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia; Martin J. Bienenstock, Ehud Barak, Joshua A. Esses, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, New York, New York; Roy T. Englert, Jr., Lukman Azeez, ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK, UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

In these consolidated appeals, Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC, appeals from the district court's orders dismissing Mar-Bow's appeals from numerous bankruptcy court orders in the underlying Chapter 11 proceeding. The district court dismissed the appeals as equitably moot and/or for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Servs. U.S., LLC, Nos. 3:16-cv-00612-MHL; 3:16-cv-00799-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2017). We deny Mar-Bow's motions for judicial notice, for leave to file a supplemental brief, and to hold the appeals in abeyance, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

IN RE: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES (2018)

Docket No: No. 17-2268, No. 17-2269

Decided: September 06, 2018

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard