UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rufus HOPKINS, a/k/a Rock, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided: August 31, 2018
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Rufus Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Rufus Hopkins appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hopkins, No. 3:07-cr-00153-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.