IN RE: Curtis RICHARDSON (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: Curtis RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson, Petitioner.

No. 18-1541

Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Curtis Richardson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Curtis Richardson filed a petition and a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a writ of execution on his default judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the petitions for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law