TUNSTALL v. Dr. Charles Stewart; Peter Woglom; Dr Arthur Davis; Dr. Samuel Micklos; Dr. Keyser; Ms. Carmen S. Hendricks, Defendants. (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Charles Alonzo TUNSTALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Frank L. PERRY; Beverly Stubbs, RN; Dr. Sami Hassan; Jane Welch, Head Nurse; Ms. Padgeant; Letitia Owens; Captain Brockington; Ms. Falcon; Paula Y. Smith, Defendants - Appellees, Dr. Charles Stewart; Peter Woglom; Dr Arthur Davis; Dr. Samuel Micklos; Dr. Keyser; Ms. Carmen S. Hendricks, Defendants.

No. 18-6285

Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No. 1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016; June 22, 2017; Jan. 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law