Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jean Murat MONTREVIL, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
Jean Murat Montrevil, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ amended order denying his motion to reopen. Montrevil’s motion was untimely filed and number-barred, and the Board declined to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen his proceedings.
We lack jurisdiction to review how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). Additionally, as we have previously determined, see Montrevil v. Holder, 343 F. App'x 861 (4th Cir. 2009), we lack jurisdiction to consider Montrevil’s petition for review absent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D) (2012). Because we are barred from reviewing Montrevil’s challenges to the Board’s denial of his motion for sua sponte reopening and Montrevil fails to raise any independent colorable constitutional claims or questions of law under § 1252(a)(2)(D), we find ourselves without jurisdiction and therefore dismiss the petition for review. We deny Montrevil’s motion to file a supplemental appendix and deny the pending motion for stay as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-1052
Decided: August 16, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)