EPPS v. MIDVALE INDEMNITY COMPANY (2018)

Sherye Epps appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Midvale Indemnity Company's (“Midvale”) motion to enforce the settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Epps leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny both parties’ motions for sanctions,^* and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Epps v. Midvale Indem. Co., No. 4:16-cv-02747-BHH, 2017 WL 6523618 (D.S.C. Dec. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   The contentions raised in Epps’ motion for sanctions are irrelevant to this action. With regard to Midvale's motion for sanctions, although we reject the summary assertions raised in Epps’ appellate filings, we find that this appeal does not warrant the imposition of sanctions.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.