Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrell Jamar HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Terrell Jamar Houston entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The district court sentenced Houston to 37 months’ imprisonment. On appeal to this court, we held that the district court properly denied the motion to suppress based on our decision in United States v. Wellons, 32 F.3d 117 (4th Cir. 1994). In Wellons, we held that a driver of a rental car who is not listed on the rental contract as an authorized driver has no expectation of privacy in the car or containers in the car and that the driver’s Fourth Amendment rights therefore were not violated by a warrantless search of the rental car and its contents. See id. at 119-20.
In Byrd v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1518, 200 L.Ed.2d 805 (2018), however, the Supreme Court held that “the mere fact that a driver in lawful possession or control of a rental car is not listed on the rental agreement will not defeat his or her otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy.” Id. at 1531. Because the Supreme Court’s decision in Byrd abrogated our decision in Wellons, the Court vacated our decision in this case and remanded for reconsideration in light of Byrd. Having considered the Supreme Court’s decision, we hereby vacate the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings. The district court should consider the matter de novo in light of Byrd, and the parties are free to raise any newly relevant issues.
VACATED AND REMANDED
PER CURIAM:
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-4340
Decided: July 26, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)